‘Lightweight opportunist’ or victim of a ‘smear campaign’? Zack Polanski divides readers as Greens make election gains – UK Times

With the local election results now unfolding across the country — and the Greens making gains in London while Reform UK surges nationally — Independent readers are deeply divided over whether Zack Polanski’s party represents a credible progressive alternative or a new form of populist politics emerging on the left.

The Greens secured one of the night’s biggest symbolic victories in the capital after Zoë Garbett won the Hackney mayoralty in what had long been considered a Labour stronghold, while the party is also on course for its best-ever local election performance nationally.

The results reflect growing frustration among many younger and left-leaning voters with Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour government, which suffered heavy losses overnight as Britain’s political landscape became increasingly fragmented.

But the Greens’ electoral momentum has coincided with mounting scrutiny of party leader Polanski, whose approval ratings fell sharply following a series of controversies — including criticism from Metropolitan Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley after Polanski reshared comments about the Golders Green attack that Rowley described as “inaccurate and misinformed”.

The backlash has since broadened into wider questions about Polanski’s judgement, leadership style and the direction of the Green Party under his leadership.

Many readers argued Labour’s shift to the right has left progressive voters politically homeless, helping explain the Greens’ rise at the ballot box. Others, however, said the recent controversies exposed serious concerns about Polanski’s credibility, political instincts and fitness for leadership — even as the party enjoys unprecedented electoral success.

Here’s what you had to say:

Polanksi is a self-declared populist

It’s about time people woke up to the fact that the Greens aren’t the benign environmental party they were under previous leaders.

Polanski is a self-declared populist who is as bad as Farage for sowing division and for lacking viable policies. There are also increasing signs of entryism from Momentum and the Corbynite left, bringing their intolerant and unpleasant views with them.

It won’t end well, because this group are always bad news. I wouldn’t be all that surprised if the Greens ended up splitting. The one thing that might save them is the party’s constitution, by which leaders only serve for a fixed term of two years.

Tanaquil2 *

A lightweight opportunist

Polanski is a lightweight political opportunist. His “gonzo communication style” needs to be treated with caution and fact-checking.

Polls show his approval ratings have dropped 14 points in the past week, according to a survey by pollster More in Common.

The British people deserve better than Polanski, and every effort should be made to deem him unfit for public office.

SinkingFeeling

Labour veering right-wing

Christ, Labour are pathetic. They veer so far into right-wing territory, they practically abandon a good portion of their voters, all because of the fear of Farage, that they then lose sight of the fact the public want something decent for a change — and that’s where Zack Polanski fits in. Now they’re trying to do the almighty of smear campaigns. It’s just disgusting, and they deserve to lose more seats as a result of it.

LimSitu

Mud-slinging

Because neither Labour, Conservative nor Lib Dem leaders or candidates have ever made stupid or thoughtless comments in the past, have they?

In this somewhat Orwellian age of people being able to revive and review every word you say or post ever, it’s increasingly easy to be walloped around the face with alleged, but headline-making, past clangers.

I think folk in large central offices are running scared and, somewhat pathetically, slinging mud. Quelle surprise! Wish we could have more issue-based, grown-up politics!

Oneof1

Sending Labour a message

There’s something seriously wrong with Labour, the Tories and Reform right now. The first two have totally lost their way.

I do think, though, the Greens need to stay clean for the sake of the country. Polanski has done a great job in making the Greens so popular, but he should realise that the party — and, more importantly, the country — needs a great number of statesmen and stateswomen to put things right.

The public have lost their hope and trust and are angry, disappointed or both. I’d vote for the Greens, despite their shortcomings, just to send a message to Labour. Labour now is anything but and needs to reinstate Labour principles and values.

Starmer has turned the party into a right-wing party in a very sneaky way. His stance on Gaza, Lebanon, appeasement of Trump, sending Charles to the USA and more have shocked me.

Maryam

Leadership questions

In my opinion, Zack Polanski does not demonstrate the level of experience or judgement I would expect from a party leader. Leadership requires careful communication and sound judgement, and recent controversies have raised questions about his suitability for such responsibility. I do not think he currently inspires sufficient confidence for a senior leadership role.

Musil

Voting Green to kick out Labour

I’m still not sure whether to vote Green just to kick out Labour in my area. They do have a good chance. This does seem like desperation to discredit the Greens. It does not work for Reform, and it will not work for the Greens.

Michael

Smear campaign

The Corbynisation of Polanski is well under way. It is simply not acceptable to have someone from the Left being popular, let alone gain some power, so the smears start.

The Notebook

Polanski looked lightweight

He didn’t handle it well. He looked lightweight. It’s a shame, as there is no other party in the UK that might work to bring about a fairer and more decent government.

If the Greens do poorly in the local elections, they will lose the reputation they had been growing until now under Polanski.

Simplesimon

Advisors told him to stay down

His advisers told him plainly, but Polanski couldn’t let it go.

After creating the faux pas with Sir Rowley, he was told, like it or not, to apologise and discreetly back away, which he did. In the light of that apology, he restored, at least partially, some modicum of respect to which a party leader might be entitled.

But he just couldn’t leave it alone. He couldn’t admit to himself he’d overstepped and been rewarded with a proverbial slap. Instead, despite advisers telling him to “stay down, son”, he went on to destroy any apology he’d made, effectively retracting it in the whiniest way possible.

In doing so, of course, he’s clearly shown that, where there were doubts about his statesmanship, those doubts are now thoroughly confirmed. He might be a nice bloke, he might have good intentions, he might even be a lot of things, but a statesman he ain’t.

OpBarras

What are the Greens about?

Not sure what the Greens are about these days. When Caroline Lucas was leader, there was a strong sense of what they were committed to and a lot of respect for her authenticity.

Now, under Polanski, the party seems to have become more of a platform for him, raising his profile without a clear agenda. They seem to have been adopted as a refuge for the Labour left, just as Reform has become a home for recalcitrant Tories.

So I’m not convinced of his ability to be a credible leader — not even an MP as yet. It will be interesting to see how this develops.

HappilyRetiredWoman

Some of the comments have been edited for this article for brevity and clarity.

Want to share your views? Simply click ‘log in’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up. Once registered, you can comment on the day’s top stories for a chance to have your opinions showcased.Recommended

Want your voice to stand out? Independent Premium subscribers enjoy priority for featured comments. Subscribe here.

Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment, click here.