UK TimesUK Times
  • Home
  • News
  • TV & Showbiz
  • Money
  • Health
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's Hot

Our ESG strategy, explained | Moneyfarm

14 November 2025

Peers call for more time to debate assisted dying bill | UK News

14 November 2025

‘The White Lotus’ saw a surge in searches for one anxiety drug. Doctors give a stark warning – UK Times

14 November 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
UK TimesUK Times
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • TV & Showbiz
  • Money
  • Health
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
UK TimesUK Times
Home » Virgil van Dijk’s goal against Man City SHOULD have stood, rules Premier League panel, despite Howard Webb’s defence of decision that enraged Liverpool
TV & Showbiz

Virgil van Dijk’s goal against Man City SHOULD have stood, rules Premier League panel, despite Howard Webb’s defence of decision that enraged Liverpool

By uk-times.com14 November 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The decision to disallow Virgil van Dijk’s goal at Manchester City last weekend was a mistake, according to the Premier League’s Key Match Incidents panel.

Van Dijk headed home to make it 1-1 before it was chalked off due to Andy Robertson, who was in an offside position, allegedly interfering with goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma.

It prompted Liverpool to contact refereeing body PGMOL to complain about the decision as they believe it did not tick the boxes in the criteria of the offside laws.

And now the Key Match Incidents panel – which comprises three former players or coaches, a representative from the Premier League and another from PGMOL – has reviewed the decision and thinks it was wrong to disallow the goal.

The panel did, though, say it was correct to not overturn the VAR decision made on the pitch as it was a subjective call.

Liverpool fans were furious with the goal being ruled out, pointing out that Robertson was never in between the ball and Donnarumma, who had a clear line of sight. 

Virgil van Dijk scored past Gianluigi Donnarumma but the goal was controversially chalked off

The Premier League's Key Match Incidents panel has said it should not have been disallowed

The Premier League’s Key Match Incidents panel has said it should not have been disallowed

After the game, Reds boss Arne Slot said: ‘I think it is obvious and clear the wrong decision has been made. He [Robertson] didn’t interfere at all with what the goalkeeper can do.’. 

He added: ‘Immediately after the game someone showed me the goal that the same referee allowed – City against Wolves last season (when Bernardo Silva was on the line for a John Stones header).

‘So it took the linesman 13 seconds to raise his flag to say it was offside. So there was clearly communication, but as I said that (goal) could have influenced the game in a positive way for us.’

But referees’ chief Howard Webb launched a staunch defence of the decision on the Match Officials Mic’d Up show on Tuesday.

Webb said: ‘Interfering with an opponent where the offside position player doesn’t play the ball and the officials have to make a judgment whether the actions of that player impact an opponent, are some of the most subjective decisions that we have to make. 

Howard Webb has launched a staunch defence of the decision to disallow Virgil van Dijk 's goal

Howard Webb has launched a staunch defence of the decision to disallow Virgil van Dijk ‘s goal

‘Therefore, it’s no surprise that some people believe this goal should have stood, so I think it’s important that we look at the facts of what actually happened in this situation.

‘We know the corner comes in and the ball reaches Van Dijk. As the ball’s coming across the penalty area, the Manchester City players move out, they leave Robertson in that offside position in the heart of the six-yard box.

‘When Van Dijk heads the ball forward, that’s the moment when we have to make an offside judgment about Robertson and about what he’s doing there.

‘We know he doesn’t touch the ball but what does he do? Well, as the ball moves towards him, three yards out from goal, right in the middle of the six-yard box, he makes that clear action to duck below the ball.

‘The ball goes just over his head, and the ball finds the goal in the half of the six-yard box where he is. Then, the officials have to make a judgment – did that clear action impact on Donnarumma, the goalkeeper, and his ability to save the ball? And that’s where the subjectivity comes into play.

Liverpool were furious at the decision and pointed out that Andy Robertson did not interfere

Liverpool were furious at the decision and pointed out that Andy Robertson did not interfere 

‘Obviously that’s the conclusion they drew on that. They looked at that position, they looked at that action, so close to the goalkeeper, and they formed that opinion.’

They also televised the conversation the officials had when disallowing the goal. 

As van Dijk scores, the AR2 (Second Assistant Referee) can be heard exclaiming: ‘Robertson, Robertson, Robertson. Robertson’s in line of vision, right in front of the keeper. He’s ducked under the ball. He’s very, very close to him. I think he’s line of vision. I think he’s been impacted, mate.’

Referee Chris Kavanagh then responds: ‘Ok, so offside then?’ to which the AR2 says: ‘I think offside.’

The VAR team led by Michael Oliver are then brought in – and they rule that Robertson is in an offside position before they consider if he has blocked Donnarumma’s vision.

Speaking to the referee, Oliver says: ‘Confirming the on-field decision off offside against Andy Robertson. He is in an offside position, very close to the goalkeeper, and makes an obvious movement directly in front of him. Check complete. Offside.’

Webb said while he understands his opinion to support the decision is ‘not a view held by everybody’ he argues that ‘it’s not unreasonable to understand why they would form that conclusion’.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related News

NFL fans stunned to learn who the girlfriend of $43m Patriots star Will Campbell is related to

14 November 2025

Fears for missing fishing influencer Mikey Rijavec after he issued mayday call while eight miles off the coast

14 November 2025

Premier League ‘deserved’ table revealed: Stats boffins name surprise team in third, a Champions League side lucky not to be in the relegation zone – and a top-six club who SHOULD be second-bottom!

14 November 2025

Suspect in custody after shooting of John Beam with Laney College icon in critical condition

14 November 2025

BYU basketball star risks career at school after arrest under suspicion of DUI

14 November 2025

Forgotten Arsenal star opens up on his future as he admits boyhood club’s ‘desire’ for him to join them

14 November 2025
Top News

Our ESG strategy, explained | Moneyfarm

14 November 2025

Peers call for more time to debate assisted dying bill | UK News

14 November 2025

‘The White Lotus’ saw a surge in searches for one anxiety drug. Doctors give a stark warning – UK Times

14 November 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest UK news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2025 UK Times. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Go to mobile version