UK TimesUK Times
  • Home
  • News
  • TV & Showbiz
  • Money
  • Health
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's Hot

BREAKING NEWSToronto Raptors fire president Masai Ujiri one day after the NBA Draft in astonishing move

27 June 2025

M1 southbound within J15 | Southbound | Congestion

27 June 2025

Man skateboards from Brighton to Africa in 55 days | UK News

27 June 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
UK TimesUK Times
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • TV & Showbiz
  • Money
  • Health
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
UK TimesUK Times
Home » Supreme Court meets Friday to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship – UK Times
News

Supreme Court meets Friday to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship – UK Times

By uk-times.com27 June 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Get Nadine White’s Race Report newsletter for a fresh perspective on the week’s news

Get our free newsletter from The Independent’s Race Correspondent

Get our free newsletter from The Independent’s Race Correspondent

The Race Report

The Supreme Court is meeting Friday to decide the final six cases of its term, including President Donald Trump’s bid to enforce his executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally.

The justices take the bench at 10 a.m. for their last public session until the start of their new term on Oct. 6.

The birthright citizenship order has been blocked nationwide by three lower courts. The Trump administration made an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to narrow the court orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the U.S.

The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years.

These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump’s efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies.

Decisions also are expected in several other important cases.

The court seemed likely during arguments in April to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools.

Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district’s diversity.

The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county’s schools.

The justices also are weighing a three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana that is making its second trip to the Supreme Court.

Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana’s six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024.

Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are considering whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time.

The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life.

At arguments in March, several of the court’s conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act.

Free speech rights are at the center of a case over a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography.

Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous.

The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn’t be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related News

M1 southbound within J15 | Southbound | Congestion

27 June 2025

Man skateboards from Brighton to Africa in 55 days | UK News

27 June 2025

Family stranded in Israel face up to 3,700-mile journey through three countries to get home to UK – UK Times

27 June 2025

Starmer says he regrets using ‘island of strangers’ phrase | UK News

27 June 2025

Starmer’s ‘cruel’ welfare cuts must be voted down despite concessions, say charities – UK Times

27 June 2025

A30 eastbound between A391 near Bodmin (west) and A38 | Eastbound | Congestion

27 June 2025
Top News

BREAKING NEWSToronto Raptors fire president Masai Ujiri one day after the NBA Draft in astonishing move

27 June 2025

M1 southbound within J15 | Southbound | Congestion

27 June 2025

Man skateboards from Brighton to Africa in 55 days | UK News

27 June 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest UK news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2025 UK Times. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Go to mobile version