- The French Open’s night sessions require a separate ticket from daytime play
- Every prime-time night session match so far has been a men’s singles contest
- Tournament director Amelie Mauresmo has faced criticism over the scheduling
Deja vu, plus ca change – pick your local phrase but whichever way you slice it, the French Open’s lopsided scheduling remains depressingly familiar.
After seven days of the tournament, every prime-time night session match has been a men’s singles. The first match on Philippe Chatrier – when it’s always half-empty because the locals are having lunch – has been a women’s singles every day.
Amelie Mauresmo did her usual mid-tournament press conference and was taken to task once again. ‘The same questions year after another,’ said the 45-year-old. ‘Same answers,’ replied her interrogator. Quite.
‘We have to take it into consideration the 15,000 spectators coming in for the night session,’ said Mauresmo.
‘Since men’s tennis is played at the best-of-five sets, three sets will be played at a minimum. It’s complicated for us to do otherwise.’
To sum up her position: when there is only one match in the night session, we will always go for a men’s match because that guarantees the punters a minimum of three sets, rather than two.
French Open tournament director Amelie Mauresmo has defended this year’s scheduling
Every prime-time night session match so far this year has been a men’s singles contest
Gael Monfils pictured waving to fans after losing to Jack Draper during Thursday’s late show
Why can’t you have two matches, a men’s and a women’s? Because then the night session would finish too late.
Why can’t you start it earlier? Because people wouldn’t be able to get there in time after leaving work, so the stands would be empty for the first match.
It is not easy to argue with any of her reasoning, but that does not make the end result any more palatable.
The truth is, the Roland Garros night session is a flawed concept to begin with. The contract with Amazon Prime Video – shaving off that one match per day from the main domestic TV deal – should never have been signed.
It is a cash grab – both for TV rights and the ability to fleece fans by selling two separate tickets for one day of action. Wimbledon is the only Grand Slam remaining without a night session – and we can thank Wandsworth council’s 11pm curfew for that. But in Melbourne and New York they always have two evening matches – one men’s, one women’s.
If you can’t do that, they don’t have a night session – this event managed just fine for 120 years without one. It’s too bloody cold in Paris in May for watching tennis at midnight, anyway – remember all the fans tucked up in blankets for Nadal v Djokovic in 2022?
Mauresmo’s lack of empathy and awareness on this issue is staggering. How can a former WTA star fail to understand – or acknowledge – the importance of visibility and platforming for the women’s game?
Women’s tennis in France is going to the dogs – they have no one in the world’s top 70. How are Mauresmo and Co going to change that when little girls come home from school, watch their national tournament and are greeted by a female-free zone?
