UK TimesUK Times
  • Home
  • News
  • TV & Showbiz
  • Money
  • Health
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
What's Hot

M5 southbound within J18 after A4 access | Southbound | Congestion

23 May 2025

Northern European Mobility Opportunity (NEMO) call

23 May 2025

Alejandro Garnacho ‘increasingly likely to leave Man United in the summer with player unhappy at bit-part role in Europa League final’

23 May 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
UK TimesUK Times
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • TV & Showbiz
  • Money
  • Health
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Trending
    • Press Release
UK TimesUK Times
Home » JD Vance picks new fight with Supreme Court over its power to check the president: ‘Profoundly wrong’ – UK Times
News

JD Vance picks new fight with Supreme Court over its power to check the president: ‘Profoundly wrong’ – UK Times

By uk-times.com21 May 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox

Get our free Inside Washington email

Get our free Inside Washington email

Inside Washington

Vice President JD Vance pushed back on Chief Justice John Roberts’s assertion that courts have the authority to “check the excesses” of the executive branch, saying the statement was “profoundly wrong.”

Amid a battle between the Trump administration and the federal judiciary over several of President Donald Trump’s executive orders and decisions, Vance placed blame on courts for wrongly interpreting the Constitution and getting in the way of Trump’s agenda.

“I saw an interview with Chief Justice Roberts recently where he said the role of the court is to check the excesses of the executive. I thought that was a profoundly wrong sentiment,” Vance said in a New York Times opinion interview.

Earlier this month, Roberts said in an interview that the judiciary requires some independence from other branches of government in order to successfully interpret the Constitution and “strike down” acts of Congress or the executive branch that they deem excessive.

Vice President JD Vance said he thought Chief Justice John Roberts was wrong for asserting courts check the excess of the executive

Vice President JD Vance said he thought Chief Justice John Roberts was wrong for asserting courts check the excess of the executive (AP)

“That’s one-half of his job,” Vance said. “The other half of his job is to check the excesses of his own branch. You cannot have a country where the American people keep on electing immigration enforcement and the courts tell the American people they’re not allowed to have what they voted for.”

Members of the Trump administration have repeatedly said that they believe the president has unconditional authority to carry out whatever agenda they desire because the president was voted on by the people.

However, the framers of the Constitution made it so that no one branch of government could be more powerful than another in a system called “checks and balances.”

While the president may nominate Supreme Court justices, the Senate confirms the nominations. In turn, the Supreme Court can overturn laws or executive actions that it finds unconstitutional.

So far, at least 25 federal courts have placed nationwide injunctions on the Trump administration within the first 100 days in office, a Congressional Research Report found.

But Vance interpreted any “checks” that federal courts have made on the Trump administration’s recent actions as “an effort by the courts to quite literally overturn the will of the American people.”

Vice President JD Vance said he believes Trump has sweeping authority as president

Vice President JD Vance said he believes Trump has sweeping authority as president (Getty Images)

The vice president said the administration plans to continue working through courts, all the way to the Supreme Court, until they determine a set of laws that will allow Trump to specifically carry out his mass deportation agenda, which has been subject to many injunctions.

But until that occurs, the administration appears to be taking court injunctions lightly, with some accusing the president of defying court orders.

The Supreme Court said the administration should “facilitate” the return of a Salvadoran man with legal status in the U.S. who says he was wrongly deported. The administration has not done so.

On Wednesday, a federal judge said the administration had violated a court order when it deported a group of immigrants to South Sudan, where a humanitarian crisis is ongoing.

In cases where judges have ruled against the administration, Trump and his allies have railed against the judges, claiming they should be impeached or that they’re decisions were politically motivated.

In March, Roberts issued a statement refuting calls for impeachment against a judge who ordered Trump to turn around a deportation flight carrying Venezuelan immigrants, accused of being gang members.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related News

M5 southbound within J18 after A4 access | Southbound | Congestion

23 May 2025

Elon Musk’s vendetta against Media Matters morphs into Trump administration investigation – UK Times

23 May 2025

A184 westbound between A19 and A194(M) | Westbound | Road Works

23 May 2025

UK weather: rain for May bank holiday weekend but not a total washout | UK News

23 May 2025

Best hotels in Mykonos 2025, reviewed – UK Times

23 May 2025

A46 northbound between A420 and M4 | Northbound | Congestion

23 May 2025
Top News

M5 southbound within J18 after A4 access | Southbound | Congestion

23 May 2025

Northern European Mobility Opportunity (NEMO) call

23 May 2025

Alejandro Garnacho ‘increasingly likely to leave Man United in the summer with player unhappy at bit-part role in Europa League final’

23 May 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest UK news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2025 UK Times. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Go to mobile version