The inquiry, held at the end of May in Golborne, addressed concerns regarding the proposed centre in Liverpool. The application attracted a significant number of representations from local residents, as well as an objection from Liverpool City Council as a statutory objector.
Twenty representations were deemed to be duly made from the papers and were treated as valid representations on environmental grounds. The City Council’s objections were made on the basis of environmental concerns as well as road safety concerns.
Commissioner Mullan heard that DVSA site inspections (three in total) showed the site had become increasingly obstructed and unsafe for vehicle movement. Mitigation proposals such as the use of banksmen, directional entry/exit and noise suppression were found insufficient. Indeed, the site’s current layout and obstructions prevent safe vehicle movement in forward gear.
Mr Mullan said “The concerns with suitability of the site, as regards road safety, are made out. I am satisfied by the case made by the council that the installation of the mirrors by the applicant is an acceptance of an inherent road safety risk, and whilst I commend the applicant for taking some action to mitigate that risk, I have further regard to the Council’s evidence that the mirrors installed would not be suitable. I have regard to the sheer height of the fence/gates, and the challenge of any driver observing other road users, including vulnerable road users, when exiting. I have little confidence that the proposed use of banksmen would be acceptable. Mr. Owens told me in evidence that he already uses banksmen, but this had been challenged by the photographic evidence and further disproven by the DVSA report.”
The full written decision can be found here.
For any further details or enquiries, please contact
Email [email protected]
